Who invented twin flames, or if it comes from something higher than nobody invented it, I guess, but someone had to explain the idea and use the words to someone else. I’m trying to say what are the origins/history of twin flames? Where does the idea come from?
I saw the 1800s thing,which is interesting and pretty cool to see kind of twin flame history, but that is just records we happen to have, and someone happened to find right? It probably goes back beyond that?
Confused by the runner-chaser dynamic? Get clarity with your personalized Twin Flame reading. Discover your astrology blueprint, receive a channeled message, and find your key milestone dates.
You’re right that it goes way back, but the actual term “twin flames” is surprisingly recent. Not Taylor Swift and MGK recent but not that much further back in the scheme of things.
Elizabeth Clare Prophet is credited with popularizing it in the 1970s through her Church Universal and Triumphant teachings. She wrote extensively about it and made the distinction between twin flames (one person, same soul) versus soul mates (multiple possibilities).
Buuut the concept behind it has roots going back to ancient Greece.
Plato’s Symposium from around 385 BCE has this myth where Aristophanes describes humans originally having four arms, four legs, two faces. Zeus split them apart and now everyone searches for their other half. That’s probably the oldest Western source we have that sounds like twin flames.
We talk about this a lot as the “history of twin flames” but Plato actually presented this as satire, and he later criticized the idea as philosophically immature. But it has stuck in cultural consciousness for over 2000 years. Jewish Kabbalah also has something similar with the concept of bashert - the idea that souls are divided before birth and destined to reunite. That tradition is genuinely ancient, developed through medieval Kabbalistic teachings but rooted in the Talmud from around 500 CE.
There are references in the Bible and throughout quite a bit of history. Even now, it shows up in our pop culture, whether using the term or not.
I don’t know if anyone really knows the proper origin of twin flames. It seems to be scattered around humanity everywhere. My guess is that even if previous writings and learnings were lost to time, we always come back to them through the experiences of those who go through the journey.
Different cultures had their own versions. I do agree that it probably predates all of that as well, coming up into human consciousness all around the world over the ages.
Even those of us who found our way here, probably didn’t read anything from Plato or the 1800s newspapers. It’s still in our heads though, even if we don’t know the words for it.
Hindu tradition has Shiva-Shakti representing masculine consciousness and feminine energy as complementary cosmic forces. There’s even a deity called Ardhanarishvara that’s literally half Shiva, half Parvati. The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad from 800-400 BCE describes a divine being splitting into male and female.
Chinese philosophy has yin-yang as complementary forces.
The thing is, these ancient traditions were talking about universal principles and internal balance more than finding your specific person. Modern twin flames focus on that one destined individual, which is different from what most ancient teachings actually said. A lot of what we see today came through the Theosophical movement in the late 1800s, then through Alice Bailey’s work in the early 1900s, and finally Elizabeth Clare Prophet gave it the specific framework we recognize now.
So it’s a blend of ancient philosophy reinterpreted through Victorian Spiritualism and New Age thought.
After Plato, you don’t see much until the Romantic period in the late 1700s-early 1800s when the idea of love itself became spiritualized. Then Victorian Spiritualism made beliefs about souls, reincarnation, and spirit communication mainstream. It’s why Hollywood is so full of “soulmates” without any real understanding of what that term was originally about.
The New Thought Movement starting in the 1830s brought in Eastern ideas about reincarnation and karma, mixing them with Western Christianity. Then, Theosophy in 1875 created this whole framework about souls originally being androgynous, then dividing through karmic consequences, reincarnating separately until reunion.
Gnostic Christianity had something called syzygy - paired divine emanations - but that was more about cosmology, not individual romantic relationships. Same with Sufism - when Rumi writes about union and the Beloved, he’s talking about God, but you could certainly draw some comparisons to twin flames. Buddhist teachings sort of contradict the whole concept because of anatta (no-self) - there’s no permanent soul to split or pair, but that gets a bit fuzzy. You could also make the argument that a lot of those teachings would support the healing journey on which it is based.
There are ancient echoes throughout the ideas of the journey, even though the term itself is relatively new.
The actual real source of the idea probably goes back before we even kept records. The same ideas seem to come up again and again the same way as we just know how to breath when we’re born.
You know what’s interesting? I remember learning about Plato’s Symposium back in school - the whole story about humans originally being split apart and searching for their other half. For the longest time, that was THE reference point everyone used when talking about soulmates. Like, that was just the default explanation for finding ‘the one.’
But the term ‘twin flame’ has really exploded in popularity in the last decade or so. Before that, I never heard anyone use that specific phrase. It was always soulmates. Same concept of two halves, same Plato reference, but different terminology.
Oh yeah, it definitely goes way further back than the 1800s!
Plato wasn’t just making up random stories. He and Socrates were both initiated into Egyptian mystery schools, and Plato shared sacred teachings by wrapping them in ‘myths.’
It was a protection strategy. Socrates had already gotten himself in major trouble (sentenced to death) for challenging the religious establishment, so Plato learned to be more careful. He’d present these spiritual truths as fictional stories - that way, if anyone questioned him, he could just say it’s just a story. Pretty clever.
So when we read about the Androgyne (the OG split soul), we’re probably not reading Plato’s imagination - we’re reading ancient Egyptian mystery school teachings that he disguised as Greek mythology. The idea of two souls that were once one is really old.
I wonder how far back this knowledge goes though. Like, what did the Egyptians learn it from…
This is fascinating and I’ve been sitting here trying to figure out if I should even respond because… I don’t know. I started writing something, deleted it. Started again.
The Egyptian mystery schools thing makes a lot of sense actually. They preserved knowledge that probably came from somewhere even older… maybe even Atlantis if you believe in that sort of thing, or older civilizations we’ve lost to time. The thing is, maybe it doesn’t even come from anywhere. Maybe it’s just… known. Like it’s encoded in us somehow, and different cultures just keep remembering it in their own way.
There has been so much information lost over time that we know about, like how the pyramids were built or how they cut perfect circles into stone. Imagine all the lost information that we have no idea about.
I keep thinking about how people find their way to understanding twin flames without reading any of this ancient stuff. We just… feel it. Experience it. Then go looking for words to describe what we already somehow understood on some level. Anyway. That’s probably more philosophical than you were asking for. Never mind, I’m probably overthinking this whole thing.
The ancient mystics probably got this knowledge through deep meditation and dream communication with their own twins, then passed it down through spiritual lineages.
I’ve been reading a lot of Rumi lately, looking for something to make sense of this. He wrote about separation and divine union 800 years ago and it feels weirdly specific to what I’m going through. The Sufis saw it as a mystical reunion with the divine through another soul. St. John of the Cross had similar ideas about union with God through the dark night.
I wonder if our ancestors understood the pain of separation differently than we do now.
Yeah, this predates the internet boom by quite a bit. I came across ‘What Dreams May Come’ from 1996 a while back, and they use the term ‘twin souls’ in that film, which surprised me because I thought this was more recent terminology.
From what I’ve heard from people who’ve been in this community longer than me, there were already Yahoo groups discussing this stuff back in the 1990s. So the language and concepts were around well before social media. I wonder how far back it goes when you trace it through different spiritual communities and literature. If it was already established enough to make it into a mainstream Hollywood film in '96, the roots probably go deeper than we realize.
We’re only seeing whatever happened to get documented and survive.
You’re right that it goes back way further than the 1800s!
This wasn’t something someone sat down and ‘invented’ - different cultures across the world kept noticing the same patterns between certain people. The recognition of these intense soul connections existed long before anyone wrote books about it or gave it a specific name.
In some ancient communities, the village elders used to observe these connections between people. They’d notice the unmistakable resonance and signs, and this awareness informed how they brought couples together. It wasn’t arbitrary at all in the beginning.
The sad part is watching how something so sacred got twisted over time. What started as recognizing genuine soul bonds eventually devolved into transactional arrangements, daughters traded for property and livestock. Humanity took this deep spiritual recognition and corrupted it into something that served ego and material gain instead.
I’ve been digging into this too, and one thing I noticed is how the ‘splitting’ concept might be a more recent Western interpretation rather than the original understanding. When you look at older spiritual traditions, particularly Eastern philosophy, they didn’t really frame it as a single soul violently divided in half. The earlier teachings seem to suggest something more like mirroring or complementary energies that were always distinct but interconnected. Like how yin and yang weren’t created by breaking something apart, they’re just inherent polarities that exist together.
So about origins: the ‘split soul’ narrative probably emerged when Western esoteric movements in the 1800s, 1900s tried to explain ancient concepts of sacred union using the scientific language of their time. They borrowed from Platonic ideas about humans originally being whole, mixed it with emerging ideas about energy and matter, and created this dramatic ‘one soul divided’ story.
The original spiritual concept across various cultures was likely more about recognition and reunion of complementary aspects rather than a catastrophic division. The disaster element might be more about our modern interpretation than any actual design.
It’s like the knowledge is somehow encoded in us already, and when people go through this journey, accessing something that’s always been there. Which would explain why so many people stumble into this journey without ever reading Plato or Prophet or any of the history, but describe eerily similar experiences.
The fact that Plato presented it as satire but it still managed to stay burning in our collective consciousness for millennia is kind of hilarious.